Farley

Farley v. Nexgen Lift Trucks CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 8, 2024E080467California5,339 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

I. Operative Complaint, Default Judgment, and Attempts to Enforce the Judgment

According to the first amended complaint (FAC), Rivera owned and operated

Crown City, a forklift service and repair business. Farley was employed by Crown City

and Rivera from August 2016 to May 2017. The FAC alleged causes of action for

assault; hostile work environment (sexual harassment); failure to prevent discrimination,

harassment, and retaliation; negligence; wrongful constructive termination in violation of

public policy; failure to provide accurate itemized wage statements; intentional infliction

of emotional distress; and negligent infliction of emotional distress.

The superior court clerk entered the default of Rivera and Crown City in August

2018. In March 2019, the trial court entered a default judgment against Crown City and

Rivera in the amount of $990,052.89. The court issued a writ of execution in July 2019.

Farley was unable to collect on the default judgment through the writ of execution, and

2 the court ordered Rivera to appear for a judgment debtor’s examination. He failed to

appear for the examination. In December 2020, the court ordered that a civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.