Farley
Farley v. Nexgen Lift Trucks CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
BACKGROUND
I. Operative Complaint, Default Judgment, and Attempts to Enforce the Judgment
According to the first amended complaint (FAC), Rivera owned and operated
Crown City, a forklift service and repair business. Farley was employed by Crown City
and Rivera from August 2016 to May 2017. The FAC alleged causes of action for
assault; hostile work environment (sexual harassment); failure to prevent discrimination,
harassment, and retaliation; negligence; wrongful constructive termination in violation of
public policy; failure to provide accurate itemized wage statements; intentional infliction
of emotional distress; and negligent infliction of emotional distress.
The superior court clerk entered the default of Rivera and Crown City in August
2018. In March 2019, the trial court entered a default judgment against Crown City and
Rivera in the amount of $990,052.89. The court issued a writ of execution in July 2019.
Farley was unable to collect on the default judgment through the writ of execution, and
2 the court ordered Rivera to appear for a judgment debtor’s examination. He failed to
appear for the examination. In December 2020, the court ordered that a civil…