In re M.S. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 8, 2024C098657California1,980 words

Opinion

Opinion

Eurie, J.

BACKGROUND

In 2019, a juvenile wardship petition was filed against M.S. under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602,1 alleging that he committed a lewd and lascivious act on a 13-year-old child. (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (a).) The juvenile court sustained the petition after M.S. admitted to committing a reasonably related offense—a misdemeanor violation of Penal Code former section 288a, subdivision (b)(1) (now Penal Code section 287, subdivision (b)(1)). (Stats. 2018, ch. 423, § 49.) In a 2019 disposition, the court placed M.S. on probation for six months under section 725, subdivision (a) without making him a ward of the court and ordered him to participate in a treatment program on sexual boundaries. (See § 725, subd. (a) [authorizing a juvenile court to place a minor on probation “for a period not to exceed six months” without adjudging the minor a ward of the court].) Two months later, in January 2020, the juvenile court modified its probation conditions after receiving a psychological evaluation and recommendation from the probation officer. The probation officer thought the ordered program on sexual boundaries would be insufficient given M.S.’s alleged conduct, which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.