Hardiman

Hardiman v. Sun Villaidence Opco CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 8, 2024F085661California3,018 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/8/24 Hardiman v. Sun Villaidence Opco CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

RENEE HARDIMAN et al.,

F085661

Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Super. Ct. No. VCU289407) v.

SUN VILLAIDENCE OPCO, LLC et al., OPINION Defendants and Appellants.

THE COURT*

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Bret D. Hillman, Judge. Beach Law Group, Thomas E. Beach and Eligio J. Luevanos for Defendants and Appellants. Robins Cloud, Brian K. Teets, Jr. and Manuel D. Balam for Plaintiffs and Respondents. -ooOoo-

* Before Poochigian, Acting P. J., Franson, J. and Smith, J. Appellants Sun Villaidence Opco, LLC, Providence Group of California, LLC, and Terri Tate (hereinafter collectively referred to as “SVO”), challenge the trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.