People v. Mendoza CA4/1
Opinion
Rubin, J.
DISCUSSION
We have reviewed the entire record as required by Wende and Anders, and considered the issues identified by Mendoza’s counsel. The abstract of judgment specifies 80 days presentence custody credits, and therefore does not accurately reflect the 177 days awarded by the trial court. Otherwise, we find no arguable issue that would result in a reversal or modification of the conviction. We therefore affirm the judgment with directions to correct the abstract of judgment. Competent counsel has represented Mendoza on this appeal.
DISPOSITION
The abstract of judgement filed on April 28, 2023, shall be amended to reflect the 177 days of presentence custody credits awarded by the trial court and a certified copy of the amended abstract shall be sent to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.
RUBIN, J.
WE CONCUR:
O’ROURKE, Acting P. J.
CASTILLO, J.
3