People v. Widener CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 11, 2024C098039California2,677 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/11/24 P. v. Widener CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yuba) ----

THE PEOPLE, C098039

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. CRF210831,

CRF2100898)

v.

AMANDA MAE WIDENER,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Amanda Mae Widener pleaded guilty to multiple offenses in two separate cases after having previously been convicted of two prior felonies, which made her presumptively ineligible for probation absent an unusual case finding. The trial court initially found the case to be unusual, suspended imposition of sentence, and placed defendant on probation, which she twice violated. After admitting the first probation violation, a second judge reinstated her on probation. After admitting the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.