Lucila Baptiste v. Apple Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 13, 202423-15392California1,199 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 13 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUCILA BAPTISTE; FREDERICK No. 23-15392

RAMOS,

D.C. No. 4:22-cv-02888-HSG Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

APPLE INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

BURKE MINAHAN; et al., No. 23-15775

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 4:22-cv-05652-YGR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

GOOGLE, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Argued and Submitted February 14, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: MILLER, BADE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiffs appeal from the dismissal of their complaints in two putative class

actions alleging that Apple, Inc. (in No. 23-15392) and Google, LLC (in No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.