Gonzalez

Gonzalez v. Hettinga Transportation CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 13, 2024F083948California20,726 words

Opinion

Opinion

Smith, J.

Filed 3/13/24 Gonzalez v. Hettinga Transportation CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

RICARDO GONZALEZ et al.,

F083948

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. VCU277573) v.

HETTINGA TRANSPORTATION, INC., OPINION Defendant and Respondent,

ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY,

Intervenor and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. David C. Mathias, Judge. Ball, Bonholtzer & Evans, Stephen C. Ball; Law Offices of James B. Kropff, James B. Kropff, for Plaintiffs and Appellants Ricardo Gonzalez et al. Chernow, Pine and Williams, Jeffrey J. Williams, for Intervenor and Appellant Zenith Insurance Company. Horton, Oberrecht & Kirkpatrick, Kimberly S. Oberrecht; Gordon & Polscer, Brian C. Hickman; Sagaser, Watkins &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.