Miranda

Miranda v. Superior Court CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 13, 2024B330458California2,446 words

Opinion

Opinion

Adams, J.

Filed 3/13/24 Miranda v. Superior Court CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ADAM MIRANDA, B330458

Petitioner, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. A362694) v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS

ANGELES COUNTY,

Respondent;

THE PEOPLE,

Real Party in Interest.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS in mandate. Ronald Coen, Judge. Petition granted. Cuauhtemoc Ortega, Federal Public Defender, Joseph Trigilio and Saivandana Petersen, Deputy Federal Public Defenders, for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. No appearance for Real Party in Interest.

‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗

Petitioner Adam Miranda filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Los Angeles Superior Court. Although…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.