In re M.C. CA4/1

DISCUSSION

M.C.’s appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738. Counsel included a statement of the case and facts but argued no grounds for reversal of the judgment. M.C.’s appellate counsel asked this court to independently review the record for error. Pursuant to Anders, counsel identifies this issue to assist the court: Was it unconstitutional to impose a firearms prohibition against the minor based on his misdemeanor battery adjudication? We reviewed the entire record as required by Wende and Anders. We have found no arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel represented M.C. both at trial and on appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

RUBIN, J.

WE CONCUR:

DATO, Acting P. J.

CASTILLO, J.

3