Herrera

Herrera v. Centre for Neuro Skills CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 13, 2024F085587California7,100 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/13/24 Herrera v. Centre for Neuro Skills CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

PRISCILLA HERRERA,

F085587

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. BCV-22-101922) v.

CENTRE FOR NEURO SKILLS et al., OPINION Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. Eric Bradshaw, Judge. Belden Blaine Raytis, T. Scott Belden and Kaleb L. Judy for Defendants and Appellants. Protection Law Group, Heather Davis, Amir Nayebdadash, Carlos Jimenez, and Jeffrey Jimenez for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo- Defendants Centre for Neuro Skills (CNS), CFN Services, Inc., and CFN Services, Inc., California appeal from a December 16, 2022 order of the Kern County Superior Court denying their motion to compel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.