Medina Rodales v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 15, 202422-1238California617 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 15 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

MARIA DE LOS ANGELES MEDINA No. 22-1238 RODALES; XOCHITL GUADALUPE Agency Nos.

CERVANTES MEDINA, A206-912-468

A206-912-469

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 12, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, McKEOWN, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Maria De Los Angeles Medina Rodales and her minor daughter, natives and

citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (BIA) order dismissing their appeal of an immigration judge’s (IJ) order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.