Francine Arthur v. Windsor Shadows Homeowner's Association

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 15, 202422-16039California629 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 15 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCINE M. ARTHUR, No. 22-16039

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00435-DJH

v.

MEMORANDUM*

WINDSOR SHADOWS HOMEOWNER'S

ASSOCIATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Diane J. Humetewa, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 15, 2024**

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, KLEINFELD, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Francine M. Arthur, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s summary

judgment and dismissal with prejudice of her claims against Windsor Shadows

Homeowner’s Association (“Windsor Shadows”) in her action alleging that

Windsor Shadows discriminated against her based on race and disability in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). violation of the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.