Charles Luckett v. Robert Neuschmid
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 15, 202421-15391California1,819 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 15 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHARLES EDWARD LUCKETT, No. 21-15391
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:18-cv-07670-HSG
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ROBERT NEUSCHMID, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 15, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: S.R. THOMAS, BEA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Habeas petitioner Charles Luckett appeals the district court’s order which
denied his petition for habeas corpus. Because the parties are familiar with the facts,
we do not recount them here. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and
2253(a). We review the district court’s denial of habeas relief de novo. Avena v.
Chappell, 932 F.3d 1237, 1247 (9th Cir. 2019). We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1. The California Court of Appeal adjudicated…