In re I.C. CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 15, 2024B329754California1,484 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. Facts and Prior Proceedings

I.C. is the only child of mother and father. Mother also has M.R., an older child with Matias R. (Matias). In early 2019, I.C. resided with mother, Matias, and M.R. At the time, mother had full custody of I.C. Father had visitation. In May 2019, the juvenile court sustained an amended petition filed by the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) alleging incidents of domestic violence, which rendered

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code. 2 These “Facts and Prior Proceedings” are taken from Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services v. Isis C. (Nov. 3, 2023, B322012, B323652, B325250) [nonpub. opn.] (In re I.C.).

2 jurisdiction appropriate. (§ 300, subds. (a) & (b)(1).3) I.C. was declared a dependent of the court, removed from mother’s custody, and released to father. Mother was permitted monitored visits. Mother’s case plan required her to participate in a batterers’ intervention program, parenting classes, and individual counseling sessions. The court also barred any visits between Matias and I.C.4 On September 20, 2020, the juvenile court sustained a petition alleging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.