People v. Spengler CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 15, 2024B331068California1,598 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

I. Defendant’s 2006 Drug Conviction

A. Plea and sentence In August 2006, and as pertinent here, defendant pled no contest to a single count of possession of methamphetamine as a felony (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)).1 The trial court placed defendant on three years of probation pursuant to the then-existing “Proposition 36” drug rehabilitation program (Prop. 36, as approved by voters, Gen. Elec. (Nov. 7, 2000)). When defendant violated that probation (and committed a new crime), the trial court sentenced him to two years in prison. The court also imposed a $200 restitution fine (pursuant to Penal Code section 1202.4, subd. (b)),2 a $20 court security assessment (pursuant to Penal Code section 1465.8, subd. (a)(1)), and a $160

Defendant also entered a plea to a misdemeanor count of vandalism and admitted he had a prior prison term.

All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.

2 lab fee (pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 11372.5, subd. (a)). The court imposed but stayed an additional $200 parole revocation fine (pursuant to Penal Code section 1202.45). B. Redesignation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.