Steven Tucker v. Don Verrett

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202422-16558California397 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVEN TUCKER, No. 22-16558 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:17-cv-00192-CKJ v.

DON VERRETT, NICOLE STUDER,

MEMORANDUM*

PAM JENSEN, JOHN MARCH, and

RICHARD ZORMEIER,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 18, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Pro se Plaintiff-Appellant Steven Tucker appeals from the district court’s

entry of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees. We have jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s decision to grant

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). summary judgment based on qualified immunity. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.