Steven Tucker v. Don Verrett
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202422-16558California397 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEVEN TUCKER, No. 22-16558 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:17-cv-00192-CKJ v.
DON VERRETT, NICOLE STUDER,
MEMORANDUM*
PAM JENSEN, JOHN MARCH, and
RICHARD ZORMEIER,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 18, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Pro se Plaintiff-Appellant Steven Tucker appeals from the district court’s
entry of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees. We have jurisdiction
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s decision to grant
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). summary judgment based on qualified immunity. See…