Makenzie Pauly v. Stanford Health Care
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202422-16655California1,068 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MAKENZIE PAULY, No. 22-16655
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-05387-SI
v. MEMORANDUM*
STANFORD HEALTH CARE, FKA
Stanford Hospital and Clinics,
Defendant-Appellee,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 18, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff-Appellant Makenzie Pauly appeals pro se from the district court’s
summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Stanford Health Care (SHC) on
Pauly’s five claimed violations of the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Active Labor Act of 1986, 42…