People v. Kamilchu CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 18, 2024C096908California2,184 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/15/24 P. v. Kamilchu CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C096908

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 18FE001319)

v.

EDWARD KAMILCHU,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Eduard Kamilchu was found guilty of arson and sentenced to the upper term of eight years. On defendant’s original appeal, we remanded for the trial court to resentence defendant under recently amended Penal Code1 section 1170. On remand, the trial court again imposed the upper term based on two aggravating factors related to defendant’s prior convictions. Defendant appeals again; now he contends the trial court’s

Undesignated section references are to the Penal Code.

1 sentence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.