Porporato

Porporato v. Unchained Labs CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 18, 2024A167144California2,993 words

Opinion

Opinion

Banke, J.

Filed 3/18/24 Porporato v. Unchained Labs CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publi- cation or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or or- dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

ROBERT W. PORPORATO,

Plaintiff and Appellant, A167144

v. (Alameda County UNCHAINED LABS, Super. Ct. No. 21CV002916) Defendant and Respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

Plaintiff and appellant Robert W. Porporato appeals from a summary judgment in favor of his former employer, defendant Unchained Labs (UL). In August 2021, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, UL adopted a mandatory vaccination policy. In areas where vaccines were available, employees were required to become vaccinated and to provide “vaccination confirmation” to the Human…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.