Seth
Seth v. Stater Bros. Markets CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff and appellant Neeru Seth filed a complaint for personal injuries alleging a
single cause of action for negligence after falling while inside a grocery store operated by
defendant and respondent Stater Bros. Markets. The trial court granted defendant’s
motion for summary judgment, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment. On appeal,
plaintiff argues (1) the trial court erred because evidence offered in opposition to
defendant’s motion showed a triable dispute of material fact, and (2) the trial court erred
when it sustained evidentiary objections to an expert declaration offered in opposition to
summary judgment. We conclude that the appellate record is inadequate to review the
merits of plaintiff’s claims and, as a result, affirm the judgment.
II. BACKGROUND
In June 2020, plaintiff filed a complaint for personal injury alleging a single cause
of action for negligence against defendant. Plaintiff clarified the nature of her allegations
in response to interrogatories by stating that she incurred an injury when she slipped and
fell while inside defendant’s grocery store because the floor was “over-waxed.”