Project Veritas v. Michael Schmidt

Good Law
95 F.4th 1152
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 202422-35271California120 words

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PROJECT VERITAS; PROJECT VERITAS No. 22-35271

ACTION FUND,

D.C. No. 3:20-cv-01435-MO Plaintiffs-Appellants, District of Oregon, Portland v.

ORDER

MICHAEL SCHMIDT, in his official capacity as Multnomah County District Attorney; ELLEN ROSENBLUM, in her official capacity as Oregon Attorney General,

Defendants-Appellees.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Judges Forrest and H.A. Thomas did not participate in the deliberations or

vote in this case.