Kevin Collins v. County of Alameda

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 20, 202422-16871California1,992 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 20 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEVIN COLLINS, No. 22-16871

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-05477-EMC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 13, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, MCKEOWN, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-appellant Kevin Collins appeals from the district court’s grant of

summary judgment for Defendants. Collins’ complaint alleged, inter alia, false

arrest and constitutional violations arising from his arrest for the shooting of

Radajsha Briggs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and review de

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. novo. See Blankenhorn v. City of Orange, 485 F.3d 463, 470 (9th Cir. 2007).

Because the parties are familiar with the history of the case, we need…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.