UPS

Brittany Wynn v. UPS

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 20, 202423-15448California1,379 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 20 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRITTANY WYNN, on behalf of herself No. 23-15448 and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-10029-CRB Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., an Ohio corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 13, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, MCKEOWN, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Brittany Wynn appeals from the district court’s dismissal

without leave to amend of her putative class action against Defendant-Appellee

United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. The district court had federal question jurisdiction over Wynn’s Fair Credit

Reporting Act (FCRA) claims, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, we have jurisdiction to review

dismissals without leave…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.