Singh

Singh v. Garland

Bad Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 20, 202423-450California595 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 20 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SUKHPREET SINGH, No. 23-450 Agency No. Petitioner, A209-937-641 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 12, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, McKEOWN, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Sukhpreet Singh petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings.

Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recount them here. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion,

and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.