People v. Stewart CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 20, 2024H051171California877 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bromberg, J.

Filed 3/20/24 P. v. Stewart CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, H051171

(Santa Cruz County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 23CR01912)

v.

STEPHEN STEWART,

Defendant and Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

We resolve this case by memorandum opinion pursuant to California Standards of Judicial Administration, Title 8, Standard 8.1. (See also People v. Garcia (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 847, 853-855.) After defendant Stephen Stewart admitted a probation violation, the trial court added a new condition: “Don’t bother anybody.” Stewart argues that this condition is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, and the Attorney General concedes that the condition is unconstitutionally vague. We accept the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.