United States v. Armando Calderon

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 22, 202422-10024California1,020 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 22 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10024

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:18-cr-00290-WHA-7 v.

ARMANDO DANIEL CALDERON, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 21, 2024 University of Pacific, McGeorge School of Law. Sacramento, California

Before: RAWLINSON and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, and ENGLAND,** District Judge.

Armando Calderon (Calderon) appeals his conviction for conspiracy to

distribute and possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr., Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of California, sitting by designation. substance containing methamphetamine (Count 8) in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§§ 846,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.