In re B.M. CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 22, 2024E082061ACalifornia1,508 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Minor committed matricide by lighting her mother’s home on fire. Minor

admitted an allegation that she had committed first degree murder. On July 1, 2021, the

juvenile court declared minor a ward of the court. The court committed her to the

Pathways to Success (pathways) program in the YTEC facility, with a maximum length

of confinement of 25 years to life, her wardship to terminate at age 25.3 (B.M., supra,

E077473.)

Minor appealed. On May 11, 2022, this court affirmed the judgment. (B.M.,

supra, E077473.)

In a review memorandum filed March 24, 2023, probation noted that minor failed

to earn full baseline term credits due to various issues in failing to complete her

educational coursework. Nevertheless, probation recommended minor “be continued a

ward of the Court and modify her commitment order to a less restrictive setting within”

YTEC.

3 We take judicial notice of our prior opinion from minor’s appeal from the judgment (People v. B.M. (May 11, 2022, E077473) [nonpub. opn.]). (Evid. Code, § 459.)

3 On April 14, 2023, probation filed a memorandum noting that minor had “taken

accountability for her offense, provided insight,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.