Hanlin

Hanlin v. X-Pest CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 22, 2024A165553California3,693 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fujisaki, J.

Filed 3/22/24 Hanlin v. X-Pest CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

GAVIN G. HANLIN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

A165553

v. X-PEST, INC. et al., (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. CGC-19-581323) Defendant and Respondent.

This is the second of two actions alleging defective and uninhabitable conditions (including a bedbug infestation) in a family’s residential dwelling unit in San Francisco. In or around 2014, the mother of then-minors Gavin G. Hanlin and Chayton M. Hanlin sued defendant X-Pest, Inc. (X-Pest) and others, alleging that X-Pest’s negligent performance of pest control services in the family’s unit caused the parents to sustain personal injuries and emotional distress. The case went to trial in 2016, and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.