People v. Maya CA4/2

statement of facts, a statement of the case, and requesting that we independently review

the record. Without suggesting any defect or omission, counsel listed as possible issues

for review: (1) whether defendant was sentenced according to his plea bargain terms, and

(2) whether the court correctly calculated defendant’s custody credits. Defendant did not

respond to notice of his opportunity to file a supplemental brief.

As relevant background information, we note only that defendant admitted as the

factual basis for his plea that “on or about February 7, 2021, [in] Riverside County, [he]

willfully and unlawfully committed an act of sodomy with a child under the age of 14”

and did so by “force, violence, duress, or menace.” He further admitted that “on or about

January 18th of 2021 in Riverside County, [he] willfully and unlawfully committed an act

of sexual penetration against a child under the age of 14, and [he] did so by means of

force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of injury . . . .”

Having examined the record and completed our independent review (People v.

Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106), we find no arguable issues.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT…