Jeremy Pinson v. Barbara Von Blanckensee
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 202422-16668California228 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 25 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON, No. 22-16668
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-00421-RM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 19, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: FRIEDLAND, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Federal prisoner Jeremy Vaughn Pinson appeals pro se from the district
court’s order denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the denial of a § 2241 petition. Lane
v. Swain, 910 F.3d 1293, 1295 (9th Cir. 2018). We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). As the district court held, the record…