United States v. Christopher Augustus

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 202422-50311California750 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 25 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50311

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:21-cr-00426-PA-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CHRISTOPHER AUGUSTUS, AKA

Michael,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 19, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Christopher Augustus appeals the sentence imposed by the district court

following his guilty plea for bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344(2) and

access device fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(5). We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

1. Augustus argues that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.