Robert Dinkins v. USA

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 202422-56089California564 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 25 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT O. DINKINS, No. 22-56089

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-06991-CAS-KES v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JUDGE; MEMORANDUM*

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS;

WARDEN, USP; LOMPOC MEDICAL,

Respondents-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Sandra M. Snyder, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 21, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Robert Dinkins appeals the district court’s dismissal of his habeas corpus

petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, in which he alleges that the United

States Penitentiary, Lompoc (“USP Lompoc”), the prison at which he is

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). incarcerated, has not taken…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.