Rakesh Dhingra v. Charles Esposito
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 202422-16774California593 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 25 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAKESH DHINGRA, No. 22-16774
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-02207-CRB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CHARLES ESPOSITO, “Chuck”; ELIINA STEPHENSON, AKA Eliina N. Belenkiy, AKA Eliina Keitelman; FBI DIRECTOR, Washington, DC; BRIAN STRETCH,
AUSA; JEROME MATTHEWS, FPD; TOM
C. SHARPE; ABDUL RAFIQI, FBI;
FRANZ P. CORRALES, FBI; NANCY L.
MAY, FBI; RAZI SHABAN, FBI; SIMONA
M. ASINOWSKI, FBI,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 20, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: FRIEDLAND, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Plaintiff-Appellant Rakesh Dhingra appeals the district…