Rakesh Dhingra v. Charles Esposito

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 202422-16774California593 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 25 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAKESH DHINGRA, No. 22-16774

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-02207-CRB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CHARLES ESPOSITO, “Chuck”; ELIINA STEPHENSON, AKA Eliina N. Belenkiy, AKA Eliina Keitelman; FBI DIRECTOR, Washington, DC; BRIAN STRETCH,

AUSA; JEROME MATTHEWS, FPD; TOM

C. SHARPE; ABDUL RAFIQI, FBI;

FRANZ P. CORRALES, FBI; NANCY L.

MAY, FBI; RAZI SHABAN, FBI; SIMONA

M. ASINOWSKI, FBI,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 20, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Plaintiff-Appellant Rakesh Dhingra appeals the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.