Ethan Printemps-Herget v. Megan Brennan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 202422-35230California429 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 25 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ETHAN E. PRINTEMPS-HERGET, No. 22-35230

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-00476-MO

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 20, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Ethan E. Printemps-Herget appeals pro se the district

court’s dismissal of his disability discrimination claims based on his termination

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). from the United States Postal Service (USPS) in December 2014.1 We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

At a 2020 pretrial conference, the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.