Wright

Wright v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 26, 2024G062122California4,378 words

Opinion

Opinion

Motoike, J.

Filed 3/26/24 Wright v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ROBERT S. WRIGHT,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G062122

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2022-01241461)

SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OPINION

OF CANADA,

Defendant and Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, William D. Claster, Judge. Affirmed. Robert S. Wright, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart and Sean P. Nalty for Defendant and Respondent. This action arises out of plaintiff Robert S. Wright’s attempts for over 25 years to recover long-term disability benefits under an insurance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.