Ronald Martinez v. D. Baughman

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 27, 202422-16750California1,273 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RONALD F. MARTINEZ, No. 22-16750

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:19-cv-01459-ADA-CDB v.

D. BAUGHMAN, Associate Director CDCR MEMORANDUM*

at CDCR Headquarters in Sacramento; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Ana de Alba, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 27, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Ronald F. Martinez appeals the dismissal of his case with prejudice, which

the district court entered after concluding that Martinez made misrepresentations

on his application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.