Ronald Martinez v. D. Baughman
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 27, 202422-16750California1,273 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 27 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RONALD F. MARTINEZ, No. 22-16750
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:19-cv-01459-ADA-CDB v.
D. BAUGHMAN, Associate Director CDCR MEMORANDUM*
at CDCR Headquarters in Sacramento; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Ana de Alba, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 27, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: FRIEDLAND, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Ronald F. Martinez appeals the dismissal of his case with prejudice, which
the district court entered after concluding that Martinez made misrepresentations
on his application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). We have jurisdiction
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we…