Knueppel

Rodrigo Aguilar v. Knueppel

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 27, 202423-15442California1,272 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RODRIGO BENITO AGUILAR, No. 23-15442

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-02214-DWL-MTM v.

KNUEPPEL, Det., Mesa Police Department, MEMORANDUM* #21600; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Dominic Lanza, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 27, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Rodrigo Benito Aguilar (“Aguilar”) appeals the district

court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants Michael Knueppel, Eli

Elliott, Richard Bates, and Joel Hight (“Defendants”) on qualified immunity

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). grounds. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.