Johnny Walls-Bey v. Phoenix, City Of

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 27, 202423-15130California1,017 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHNNY RAY WALLS-BEY, AKA Johnny No. 23-15130 Procopio, AKA Johnny Ray Walls, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 2:22-cv-01597-DLR-MTM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PHOENIX, CITY OF; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 27, 2024, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Johnny Ray Walls-Bey appeals the dismissal of his Second Amended

Complaint (“SAC”). Because Walls-Bey was proceeding in forma pauperis,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) the district court screened the SAC prior

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). to receiving a response from Defendants. The district court dismissed the SAC for

failure to state a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.