In Re: Philip Jaurigui v. Jonathan Mover

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 27, 202423-60028California1,431 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: SWING HOUSE REHEARSAL AND No. 23-60028

RECORDING, INC.; PHILIP JOSEPH

JAURIGUI, BAP Nos. 22-1218 2:18-ap-01351-RK Debtors. ______________________________

MEMORANDUM*

PHILIP JOSEPH JAURIGUI,

Appellant,

v.

JONATHAN MOVER,

Appellee.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Gan, Faris, and Spraker, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted March 25, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, GOULD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge GOULD.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Philip Joseph Jaurigui appeals the bankruptcy court’s order excepting from

his bankruptcy discharge a judgment entered against him in favor of Jonathan Mover

in the amount of $239,288.50, plus interest. We have jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.