Gregory Nelson v. Benjamin Frahs
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 27, 202422-35661California1,216 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 27 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GREGORY JOSEPH NELSON, No. 22-35661
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:22-cv-00068-BLW
v.
MEMORANDUM*
BENJAMIN FRAHS, CPL., ISCC; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 27, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: FRIEDLAND, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Gregory Joseph Nelson appeals pro se from the district court’s dismissal of
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, which the district court entered after it denied
Nelson’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and Nelson did not pay
the filing fee. The district court then denied Nelson’s motion for relief from
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…