Gregory Nelson v. Benjamin Frahs

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 27, 202422-35661California1,216 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GREGORY JOSEPH NELSON, No. 22-35661

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:22-cv-00068-BLW

v.

MEMORANDUM*

BENJAMIN FRAHS, CPL., ISCC; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 27, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Gregory Joseph Nelson appeals pro se from the district court’s dismissal of

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, which the district court entered after it denied

Nelson’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and Nelson did not pay

the filing fee. The district court then denied Nelson’s motion for relief from

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.