Donald Smith v. Dharmyir Singh
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 27, 202423-15351California420 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 27 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DONALD JOSHUA SMITH, No. 23-15351
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00101-TLN-JDP v.
DHARMYIR SINGH, Doctor; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 27, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: FRIEDLAND, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Donald Joshua Smith appeals pro se from the district court’s grant of
summary judgment to Defendant Dr. Dharmyir Singh.1 Smith alleges that Dr.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Smith’s motions for default judgment are DENIED. Dkt. Nos. 18, 20. To the extent Smith intends to invoke forfeiture, Dr. Singh had already timely filed an…