Arambula-Bravo

Arambula-Bravo v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 27, 202421-826California772 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSEFINA ARAMBULA-BRAVO, No. 21-826 Agency No. Petitioner, A093-374-921 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 25, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, GOULD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Josefina Arambula-Bravo is a native and citizen of Mexico. In

2010, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) served her with a Notice to

Appear (NTA) that did not contain a date or time for her initial removal hearing.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Petitioner moved to terminate proceedings; when her motion was denied, she

applied for cancellation of removal and adjustment of status. An immigration

judge (IJ) denied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.