Kurd-Misto

Kurd-Misto v. State Farm General Ins. Co. CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 27, 2024G061949California3,616 words

Opinion

Opinion

Motoike, J.

Filed 3/26/24 Kurd-Misto v. State Farm General Ins. Co. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

BAHJAT KURD-MISTO,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G061949

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2020-01138427)

STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE OPINION

COMPANY,

Defendant and Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Nathan R. Scott, Judge. Reversed and remanded with directions. Cedar Adams and Adam K. Obeid for Plaintiff and Appellant. WFBM, Jean M. Daly and Christy Gargalis for Defendant and Respondent. Plaintiff Bahjat Kurd-Misto appeals following the trial court’s grant of a motion for summary judgment in favor of defendant State Farm…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.