Amirtalesh

Amirtalesh v. City of Beverly Hills CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 27, 2024B326610California4,194 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chavez, J.

Filed 3/27/24 Amirtalesh v. City of Beverly Hills CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

SHAHNAZ AMIRTALESH, B326610

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV12211) v.

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, William A. Crowfoot, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Office of Maximilian Lee and Maximilian Lee for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Burke, Williams & Sorensen, Michael R. Nebenzahl and Charles H. Abbott for Defendant and Respondent. Shahnaz Amirtalesh (appellant) appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of respondent City of Beverly Hills (the City) on appellant’s claims against the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.