People v. Watson CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 27, 2024B330218California346 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baltodano, J.

Filed 3/27/24 P. v. Watson CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B330218 (Super. Ct. No. 2020010397) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Ventura County)

v.

JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER

WATSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

In 2019, 12-year-old S.S. received a series of sexually explicit messages on her cell phone. She later came home early from a wedding, asked her mother if she could go to the park late one night, and then did not want to attend school. None of these behaviors were typical for S.S. Her mother grew concerned. She took S.S.’s phone and determined that Justin Christopher Watson had sent the explicit messages. The messages indicated that Watson, then age 21, knew S.S. was a minor.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.