Doe

Doe v. Regents of the U. of Cal. CA2/4

Caution
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 27, 2024B327252California5,842 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/27/24 Doe v. Regents of the U. of Cal. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

JOHN DOE, B327252

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No.20STCP01381) v.

REGENTS OF THE

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mitchell L. Beckloff , Judge. Affirmed. Hathaway Parker, Mark M. Hathaway, Jenna E. Parker for Plaintiff and Appellant. Quarles & Brady, Sandra L. McDonough for Defendant and Respondent. After his employment at the University of California, Los Angeles was terminated, appellant Dr. David Baron1 filed a complaint pursuant to the Personnel Policies for Staff Members (PPSM) promulgated by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.