Patel

Patel v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 202423-282California697 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANJAYKUMAR PRAHLADBHAI No. 23-282 PATEL, Agency No.

A215-823-741

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 26, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON, LEE, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Sanjaykumar Prahladbhai Patel, a citizen of India, seeks review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision denying his motion to reopen immigration

proceedings on his 2019 removal order. “We review a BIA ruling on a motion to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). reopen for an abuse of discretion and will reverse the denial of a motion to reopen

only if the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.