Patel
Patel v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 202423-282California697 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 28 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SANJAYKUMAR PRAHLADBHAI No. 23-282 PATEL, Agency No.
A215-823-741
Petitioner,
v. MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 26, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: RAWLINSON, LEE, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Sanjaykumar Prahladbhai Patel, a citizen of India, seeks review of a Board of
Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision denying his motion to reopen immigration
proceedings on his 2019 removal order. “We review a BIA ruling on a motion to
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). reopen for an abuse of discretion and will reverse the denial of a motion to reopen
only if the…