Farias Lopez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 202423-2California738 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 28 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FIDELINA FARIAS LOPEZ; ANTHONY No. 23-

VILLA FARIAS,

Agency Nos. Petitioners, A208-308-001

A208-308-002

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 25, 2024** Seattle, Washington

Before: W. FLETCHER, WARDLAW, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Fidelina Farias Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing her appeal from

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of her application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Farias

Lopez’s minor son, Anthony Villas Farias, was a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.