In re M.S. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This juvenile court case stems from a contentious marital dissolution proceeding.
In February 2020, the family court issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) protecting
father and the children from mother. The court temporarily ordered that father have
custody of the children and that mother have no contact with them. The family court
found mother’s allegations against father, in her own request for a TRO, were not
credible and that she had been untruthful during her testimony. In addition, the court
indicated it was concerned mother had been coaching the children. In September 2020,
the family court awarded father sole legal and physical custody of the children and
ordered that mother have supervised visits. Mother was granted unsupervised visits the
following August. Finally, in October 2021, the parents agreed to share legal and
physical custody of the children.
In November 2021, DPSS received a referral that mother had threatened father
with a knife and encouraged the children to vandalize father’s property. When
interviewed, M.S. said she was afraid of father because he was “mean.” She also said
father starved the children,…