Robinson

Robinson v. Stryker Corp. CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 28, 2024H050336California12,050 words

Opinion

Opinion

Manoukian, J.

Filed 3/28/24 Robinson v. Stryker Corp. CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

JOSHUA ROBINSON, H050336

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 20CV366898)

v.

STRYKER CORPORATION,

Defendant and Respondent.

Appellant Joshua Robinson filed this action on June 1, 2020, under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA; Lab. Code, § 2698 et seq.) against respondent Stryker Corporation (Stryker), a medical technology company.1 Robinson alleged that Stryker had committed various Labor Code wage and hours violations. He alleged that he was bringing the action “on behalf of himself and other current and former aggrieved employees of [Stryker] for penalties.” Stryker moved for summary judgment on the grounds,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.