Robinson
Robinson v. Stryker Corp. CA6
Opinion
Opinion
Manoukian, J.
Filed 3/28/24 Robinson v. Stryker Corp. CA6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
JOSHUA ROBINSON, H050336
(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 20CV366898)
v.
STRYKER CORPORATION,
Defendant and Respondent.
Appellant Joshua Robinson filed this action on June 1, 2020, under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA; Lab. Code, § 2698 et seq.) against respondent Stryker Corporation (Stryker), a medical technology company.1 Robinson alleged that Stryker had committed various Labor Code wage and hours violations. He alleged that he was bringing the action “on behalf of himself and other current and former aggrieved employees of [Stryker] for penalties.” Stryker moved for summary judgment on the grounds,…